37%
Fewer SOX key controls at OpenText
Senior-led rationalization reduced key controls by 37% with full external auditor reliance maintained.
Side-by-side comparison
| sideLook | RSM Middle-Market Compliance | |
|---|---|---|
| Who does the work | Senior practitioner on every task | Partner-led, with managers and staff executing |
| Middle-market fit | Built for pre-IPO and mid-cap public companies | Strong middle-market focus and footprint |
| Independence limits | No audit practice, no conflicts | Cannot advise where they are your auditor |
| Program design | Right-sized, removes redundancy and audit fatigue | Standardized methodologies |
| Bundled services | Compliance and risk only | Audit, tax and consulting under one roof |
| National coverage | U.S.-focused, remote and on-site | Offices across the U.S. and member firms abroad |
Pricing model
We don't publish fees. Here is how the models differ.
sideLook
- Fixed-scope, project-based engagements
- No blended-rate pyramid
- SOX rationalization typically 3–6 months
RSM Middle-Market Compliance
- Blended rates across partner, manager and staff
- Often priced alongside audit or tax relationships
- Scope and staffing can shift across cycles
When to choose each
Honest scope: sideLook isn't the right fit for every company.
Choose sideLook if…
- You want senior expertise on every control, not just at kickoff
- You need an advisor independent of your audit firm
- You want a leaner, defensible program in months, not years
Choose RSM Middle-Market Compliance if…
- You want audit, tax and consulting bundled with one firm
- You need a large team across many U.S. locations
- RSM is not your auditor and you value one-vendor simplicity
Not sure which fits? Let's talk.
Competitor descriptions reflect general, publicly known delivery models and may not describe every engagement. Firm names are trademarks of their owners.
